Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hobson v. Black Mountain Marketing and Sales, LP et al-(TV3)
as 3:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Charles Hunter Hobson
Defendant:
Black Mountain Marketing and Sales, LP and Black Mountain Marketing and Sales, GP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hunter v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv03201
Plaintiff:
Charles Hunter
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Hunter
as 2:2021cv11211
Defendant:
Charles Hunter
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Marchbanks et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10322
Plaintiff:
Mary P. Alexander, Keyanna Tims, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Leo A. Daly Company, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05202
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy Hunter and Charles Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Douglas et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11287
Plaintiff:
Willie Douglas , Etta Douglas , Charles Shehee and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley, et al v. U. S. Steel Corp.
as 08-2311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALCOLM MOULTON
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OUNDRA STANLEY, KAREN WARD, CHARLES HUNTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Movant:
RON ANDERSON
Stanley, et al v. United States Steel Corporatio
as 08-2312
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KAREN WARD, OUNDRA STANLEY, CHARLES HUNTER and others
Movant - Appellant:
RON ANDERSON, Lead putative class member
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Jones v. Java Girls et al
as 1:2008cv00658
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jones
Defendant:
Java Girls, Charles Hunter and New Java Girls
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
