Cases 41 - 50 of 4,711
Romeo #266244 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
James Elliott Romeo
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, David Shinn and Terry Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collingwood v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv05546
Plaintiff:
Waylon Collingwood
Defendant:
Curtis Bass, Lawrence Ende, Larhonda Traylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Ryan et al
as 2:2020cv01376
Defendant:
Betty Hahn, Centurion Health, Juanita Harrison and others
Plaintiff:
Mark L Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorge Guerrero v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 22-15039
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE GUERRERO
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General and DAVID SHINN, Director
Williams v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv02151
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
David Shinn, C Amos, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weber v. Ryan et al
as 2:2021cv02040
Plaintiff:
Cory Brett Weber
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Smith, Terry Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv09507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kasey Hayes v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 21-16600
Petitioner / Appellant:
KASEY MARKEITH HAYES, named as: Kasey M Hayes
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Alfred Green v. Corizon Health Services, et al
as 21-16571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., DAVID SHINN, Director, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
