Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Habiniak v. MNB Ventures
as 21-40671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Habiniak
Defendant / Appellee:
MNB Ventures, Incorporated, each in their individual capacity, Texas National Bank, each in their individual capacity, Heriberto Alanis, each in their individual capacity and others
Habiniak v. Ramirez
as 21-40678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Habiniak
Defendant / Appellee:
Mario E. Ramirez, Jr., Judge, C. Wesley Kittleman, Attorney, Carlos Yzaguirre, Attorney and others
McAllen Holiday LLP d/b/a La Copa Hotel v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 7:2012cv00205
Plaintiff:
McAllen Holiday LLP
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and Charles Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
James Anderson , Sierra Batiste , Zachary Batiste and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00576
Plaintiff:
James Anderson, All Plaintiffs, Sierra Batiste and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Murray
as 08-41224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHARLES MURRAY
Strickland v. The State of Texas et al
as 2:2008cv00362
Petitioner:
Charles Murray Strickland
Respondent:
The State of Texas, B D Moye, William R. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Strickland v. The State of Texas
as 4:2008cv00020
Petitioner:
Charles Murray Strickland
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strickland v. State Of Texas et al
as 2:2007cv00161
Petitioner:
Charles Murray Strickland
Respondent:
State Of Texas and Judge B.D. Moye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
