Cases 1 - 10 of 17
NIELSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03703
Plaintiff:
CHARLES NIELSEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIELSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58184
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CHARLES NIELSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01995
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00158
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nielsen v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03581
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nielsen v. Bloomberg
as 12-4313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Nielsen, AKA Charles Nielson
Defendant:
Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor-NYC, Michael A. Stocker, Chairperson-NYC-HHC M.D., Christopher Constantino, Executive Director, Elmhurst Hospital and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Elaine A. Rabin, M.D.
Cynthia Mahler et al v. Charles Nielsen et al
as 2:2012cv07050
Defendant:
Active Drive Inc, Danivesco, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Mahler and Harvey Mahler
Roland Schelenz v. Charles Nielsen et al
as 2:2012cv07055
Defendant:
Active Drive Inc, Danivesco, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Roland Schelenz
The Jon and Dina Payne 1996 Family Trust v. Charles Nielsen et al
as 2:2012cv07042
Defendant:
Active Drive Inc, Danivesco, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Jon and Dina Payne 1996 Family Trust
Miller and Sher LP v. Charles Nielsen et al
as 2:2012cv07044
Defendant:
Active Drive Inc, Danivesco, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Miller and Sher LP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
