Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Odeh v. Roper, et al
as 08-10780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAMA ODEH
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ROPER, CHARLES M BLEIL, TERRY R. MEANS, U. S. District Judge and others
Luevano v. U.S. Circuit Clerks et al
as 2:2008cv04034
Plaintiff:
Jamie Luevano
Defendant:
U.S. Circuit Clerks, Charles R Fulbruge, III, Judge Garza and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Odeh v. Maule, et al
as 08-10606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAM ODEH
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT A MAULE, RICHARD ROPER, WILLIAM F SANDERSON, U. S. District Judge and others
Luevano v. Circuit Clerks et al
as 5:2008cv00836
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
U S Circuit Clerks, Charles R Fulbruge, III, Garza and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-10058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carr v. Mahone et al
as 4:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Carr
Defendant:
Karen Mahone, Charles R Fulbruge, III and William H Suter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Spitzer et al
as 9:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith and Lilly Schmidt
Defendant:
Eliot Spitzer, Andrew M. Cuomo, Michael Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01945
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Morris v. Fulbruge et al
as 2:2007cv05429
Plaintiff:
James Allen Morris
Defendant:
Charles R Fulbruge, III, Monica Washington and Anthony J Bonfanti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Supreme Co. of the U.S. et al
as 2:2007cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Supreme Co. of the U.S., William K Suter, Charles R Fulbruge, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
