Cases 61 - 70 of 176
DARK v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2015cv00266
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DARK
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY , RYAN P. POWNALL , JOHN DOE #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARGRAVE v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARGRAVE
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOLLOIVER et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS TOLLOIVER and JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 2:2015cv10025
Plaintiff:
Charles Ramsey
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LEMAR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv07102
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEMAR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT , CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2014cv07109
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS SANTIAGO , MARGARITA SANTIAGO and EXOR SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON v. MCCLOSKY et al
as 2:2014cv06799
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NEWTON and LUZ GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCCLOSKY, MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURDIE et al v. SPICER et al
as 2:2014cv06639
Plaintiff:
RONALD PURDIE , RAGIB WITHERSPOON and JAMES FANNINGS
Defendant:
MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEOLA v. BENEDICK et al
as 2:2014cv05682
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FEOLA
Defendant:
GERALD F. BENEDICK, JR. , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CHARLES RAMSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yuwsha Alwan v. Pamela Dembe, et al
as 14-4030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YUWSHA ALWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA P. DEMBE, LILLIAN HARRIS RANSOM, PATRICK F. DUGAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
