Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Wang et al v. Grubhub Inc.
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Charles Wang, Marilee Bogaert, Aaron Aseltine and others
Defendant:
Grubhub Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Seals v. Wang et al
as 1:2018cv05492
Plaintiff:
Tina Seals
Defendant:
Charles Wang, Charles Wang Doe, Chinese Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bi et al v. McAuliffe et al
as 1:2017cv01459
Plaintiff:
Lin Lin, Meiming Shen, Xia Bi and others
Defendant:
Does 1-100, Terry McAuliffe, Xiaolin Charles Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Wang v. Thomson et al
as 5:2014cv02388
Plaintiff:
Charles Wang
Defendant:
Taylor Thomson, David Systrom, K. Hesse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. EAdgear Holdings USA, Inc., et al
as 3:2014cv00504
Plaintiff:
Randal Ray Williams
Defendant:
EAdgear Holdings USA, Inc., eAdGear, Inc., GoFun Places, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Johnson v. eAdGear Holdings USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00432
Plaintiff:
Molly Johnson
Defendant:
eAdGear Inc., GoFun Places, Inc., Francis Yuen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Charles Wang v. Kamala Harri
as 13-16009
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WANG
Respondent - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS
eAdGear, Inc. et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv01186
Plaintiff:
eAdGear, Inc. and GoFunPlaces, Inc.
Defendant:
Randal Williams, Prosperity Formula, LLC, Jubimax LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Williams v. EAdgear Holdings USA, Inc., et al
as 5:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Randal Ray Williams
Defendant:
EAdgear Holdings USA, Inc., EAdgear, Inc., GoFun Places, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
