Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
William Davis, II v. Albert Singer
as 15-1602
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Plaintiff: BABY J.F.D., c/o William S. Davis, II and ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased
Defendant - Appellee: ALBERT J. SINGER, DANIELLE DOYLE, SYDNEY J. BATCH and others
William Davis, II v. Albert Singer
as 14-1999
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Plaintiff: J.F.D., c/o William S. Davis, II and ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased
Defendant - Appellee: ALBERT J. SINGER, DANIELLE DOYLE, SYDNEY J. BATCH and others
William Davis, II v. Albert Singer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2505
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, J.F.D., c/o William S. Davis, II and ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased
Defendant - Appellee: ALBERT J. SINGER, DANIELLE DOYLE, SYDNEY J. BATCH and others
William S. Davis, Jr. v. Charlotte Mitchel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2081
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor and J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
William Davis, II v. Albert Singer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1649
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, J.F.D., c/o William S. Davis, II and ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased
Defendant - Appellee: ALBERT J. SINGER, WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, DANIELLE DOYLE and others
Davis et al v. Singer et al
as 4:2013cv00007
Plaintiff: William S. Davis, II, Baby J.F.D. and Estate of William Scott Davis Sr.,
Defendant: Albert J. Singer, Wake County Governmenet, Danielle Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
William Scott Davis, Jr. v. Charlotte Mitchel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2552
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor and J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Charlotte Mitchel
as 12-2133
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor and J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
Davis et al v. Mitchel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00493
Plaintiff: William Scott Davis, Jr. and J.F.D.
Defendant: Charlotte Mitchel, Wendy Kirwan, Naomie Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 12-7070
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor, MELANIE A. SHEKITA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?