Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Chau v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03326
Plaintiff:
Tuan Chau
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Chau v. Mullin et al
as 8:2026cv02600
Plaintiff:
Siu Yik Sam Chau
Defendant:
Markwayne Mullin, Joseph B. Edlow and Todd Blanche
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chung v. Parsons
as 3:2026cv08754
Plaintiff:
Chau Chung
Defendant:
Nathan Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01823
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) McElroy v. Delgado et al
as 1:2026cv05495
Plaintiff:
Latwahn McElroy
Defendant:
A. Delgado, J. Moeckly, L. Pennisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McElroy v. Delgado et al
as 2:2026cv02604
Plaintiff:
Latwahn McElroy, Lathwahn McElroy, Jabbari McElroy and others
Defendant:
A. Delgado, J. Moeckly, L. Pennisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05273
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06964
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
