Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Robert Schilling v. United States House of Representatives, et al
as 22-5290
Plaintiff / Appellant: Robert Schilling
Defendant / Appellee: United States House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform of the U.S. House of Representatives and others
Moorehead v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv03959
Plaintiff: Mr. Jason Moorehead
Defendant: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN, Board of School Directors of the School District of the City of Allentown, Mr. Thomas Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2022cv00128
Plaintiff: AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: CHERYL L JOHNSON and LAURENS C LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
SCHILLING v. PELOSI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00162
Petitioner: ROBERT SCHILLING
Not Classified By Court: SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Defendant: NANCY PELOSI, CHERYL L. JOHNSON and CATHERINE SZPINDOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Darren Aquino, et alIn re: Darren Aquino, et al
as 21-10927
Respondent: SARAI, FINANCIAL OFFICER, RIVERDALE NURSING HOME, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (EFC), Employees, Supervisors, Managers, in their official capacity and others
Petitioner: In re: DARREN AQUINO and FERNANDO GAUD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00072
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00021
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kevin Mccarthy, et al v. Nancy Pelosi, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5240
Defendant / Appellee: Nancy Pelosi, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 12th Congressional District, Cheryl L. Johnson, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Clerk of the United States House of Representatives and Paul D. Irving, in his official capacity as Sergeant-at-Arms of the United States House of Representatives
Plaintiff / Appellant: David S. Schweikert, The Honorable, in his official capacity as Member of the United States House of Representatives for the Arizona 6th Congressional District, Kevin Owen Mccarthy, The Honorable, in his official capacity as House Minority Leader and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 23rd Congressional District, James Shipley Swayze and others
Amicus Curiae: Individual Rights Foundation, Reason Foundation and Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence
City of San Jose, California et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv05167
Plaintiff: Black Alliance For Just Immigration, King County, Washington, Sam Liccardo and others
Defendant: Cheryl L Johnson, Wilbur L. Ross, Donald J. Trump and others
Amicus Curiae: Libby Garland, Ron Wyden, Steven Ruggles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COMMON CAUSE et al v. TRUMP et al Featured Case
as 1:2020cv02023
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., CHERYL L. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff: ANDREA M. ALEXANDER, ROBERTO AGUIRRE, SHEILA AGUIRRE and others
Amicus Curiae: LIBBY GARLAND, LUSH COSMETICS LLC, STEVEN RUGGLES and others
Petitioner: ELIZABETH WARREN, IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE and RON WYDEN
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?