Cases 1 - 10 of 22
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 3:2011cv02591
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Mondis Technology Ltd v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00565
Defendant:
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Chimei InnoLux Corporation, LG Electronics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mondis Technology Ltd
Consolidated Defendant:
Envision Peripherals Inc, Top Victory Electronics (Fujian) Co Ltd, Top Victory Electronics (Taiwan) Co Ltd and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
TPV International (USA) Incorporated
Intervenor:
Inpro II Licensing SARL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ROVI CORPORATION et al v. INTERNATIONAL JUDICAL ASSISTANCE
as 1:2012mc00543
Petitioner:
ROVI CORPORATION , ROVI GUIDES INCORPORATED , ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
TCL CORPORATION, TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., DONGGUAN CONTEL ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: Application for Letters Rogatory
State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 12-60704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel Jim Hood, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INCORPORATED, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
Rockwell Automation Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv02495
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Automation Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 12-90051
Plaintiff - Respondent:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel Jim Hood, Attorney General
Defendant - Petitioner:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INCORPORATED, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
Rockwell Automation Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00369
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Automation Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rockwell Automation Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as WIE/2:12-cv-00369
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Automation Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corp. and others
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15300
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LTD., NEXGEN MEDIA TECH USA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC. and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Appellant:
BARRY HIMMELSTEIN
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15295
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LTD., NEXGEN MEDIA TECH USA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Appellant:
MICHAEL J. RINIS, President, Rinis Travel, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC. and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
