Cases 1 - 10 of 6,029
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Myers v. Worlds et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Sean Lee Myers
Defendant:
Rachette Worlds, Dr Christopher Betts, James Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Costello et al
as 3:2024cv50178
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan
Defendant:
Terry Costello, Trish Senneff and James Fagerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Crittendon
as 24-1830
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CRITTENDON
GUTIERREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00800
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO MOJICA GUTIERREZ and CHRISTOPHER MONTOYA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patricia Keitel, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Eric Petersen, deceased v. Hart et al
as 4:2024cv04082
Plaintiff:
Patricia Keitel
Defendant:
Darren Hart, Rock Island County, Michael Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
