Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hemphill v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Corey Hemphill
Defendant:
Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education, Christopher Bernard and Christopher K. Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plater v. Andrews
as 5:2018hc02146
Petitioner:
Christopher Bernard Plater
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Christopher Plater
as 17-4529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD PLATER
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , Rose Phipps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Christopher Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections
as 09-7309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT, SC DEPT PROBATION PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES and others
US v. Christopher Evans
as 08-7409
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD EVANS
Christopher Jones v. Perry Luthi, Sr.
as 08-1762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY S. LUTHI, SR., DESMINE SARDINE, LUTHI MORTGAGE COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , SC Dept Probation Parole and Pardon Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. South Carolina General Assembly et al
as 6:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina General Assembly, Mark Sanford, SC Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
