Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BOWLING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28227
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BOWLING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellant:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
MARK FRENCH, BRIAN JOHNSON, ROBERT W. DIERKS and others
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 21-3046
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BOWLING, HERMAN JONES, ROBERT WARE and others
Defendant:
MARK FRENCH, ROBERT W. DIERKS, BRIAN JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Dartez v. French, et al
as 21-3045
Defendant:
RICK PETERS, COLBY J. MARKHAM, CHRISTOPHER P. MAI and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN JOHNSON, MARK FRENCH, JOSEPH EHRLICH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Bowling v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2020cv03518
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Collins et al
as 1:2020cv04418
Defendant:
Kurt Collins and Christopher Bowles
Plaintiff:
Quincy Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Hines v. City of Columbus, Ohio, et al
as 16-3333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH HINES
Defendant:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO, KIMBERLEY JACOBS, RICHARD BASH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DEWITT
Hines v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hines
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Kimberley Jacobs, Richard Bash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holiness Is The Way Ministries, Inc. v. Coweta County, Georgia
as 3:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Holiness Is The Way Ministries, Inc. and Christopher Bowles
Defendant:
Coweta County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
