Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brem v. Howard County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Chrstopher D. Brem and Christopher Daniel Brem
Respondent:
Howard County Sheriff and Stan Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Daniel v. Young County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel
Defendant:
Young County Jail, Jones County Jail, Stamford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Big K Bail Bonds et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel
Defendant:
Big K Bail Bonds, Stamford Police Department and Chad Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Martha Castillo, Michael Welty, Michael King and others
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Guzman Santos, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. David et al
as 3:2019cv00068
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Warden Gregory S. David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ferrovial Agroman US Corp.
as 1:2014cv01125
Defendant:
Ferrovial Agroman US Corp.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Ferrovial Agroman US Corp.
as 1:2014cv01126
Defendant:
Ferrovial Agroman US Corp.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McNosky et al v. The State of Texas
as 1:2013cv00631
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel McNosky and Sven Stricker
Defendant:
Texas Governor Rick Perry and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wyatt v. Thaler
as 3:2009cv00230
Petitioner:
Christopher Daniel Wyatt
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wyatt v. TDCJ
as 5:2009cv00104
Petitioner:
Christopher Daniel Wyatt
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
