Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Welenc v. Donelan et al
as 3:2020cv30196
Plaintiff:
Sean Alan Welenc
Defendant:
Robert Haigh and Christopher J. Donelan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kim v. Donelan
as 1:2019cv12342
Respondent:
Marcos Charles, William P. Barr, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Soeun Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-1900
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reid, et al v. Donelan, et al
as 19-1787
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, CHRISTOPHER J. DONELAN, Sheriff, Franklin County, Massachusetts and others
Interested Party:
JOHN HAWKINSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEO FELIX CHARLES, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, ROBERT WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and MARK ANTHONY REID
Jobe v. Donelan et al
as 3:2018cv30004
Petitioner:
Momodou Lamin Jobe
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan , Jeff Sessions, Elaine Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1341
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv30033
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv30026
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1172
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Palmer v. Donelan et al
as 3:2014cv01888
Petitioner:
Horatio C. Palmer
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan and Eric H. Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
