Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MOORE v. DIVISON OF PRISON DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
ALEX MOORE
Defendant:
DIVISON OF PRISON DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JAMAAL MCQUEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Weir et al
as 5:2023ct03064
Plaintiff:
Jamareo LaVar Caldwell
Defendant:
Brendan Weir, Christopher Jones, Joseph Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bartley et al
as 7:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Ron Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Robert Blane Bartley, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Gayles-El v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Devon A. Gayles-El
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Todd Ishee, Erik A. Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00493
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Battle v. Taylor et al
as 5:2020ct03258
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Caroline R. Taylor, Angela M. Dellaripa and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Devon Armond Gayles and Devon A. Gayles El
Defendant:
Tracy Boone, Paul L. Maloney, Mary Malesky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2020cv00126
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. ATS, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones and Roger Bunch
Defendant:
ATS, Inc. and Anderson Trucking Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
