Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WHISLER et al v. O'CONNOR et al
as 5:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WHISLER and EW
Defendant:
TIMOTHY O'CONNOR, JOHN DOE, CHRISTOPHER PARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIEBOLD v THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv02100
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. DIEBOLD
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and CHRISTOPHER PARIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Rodriguez v. Taiarol et al
as 2:2021cv01958
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ryan Taiarol, Jason Mamaril, Kathryn Abdallah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Paris et al v. Guberman PMC, LLC, et al
as 8:2020cv02176
Plaintiff:
Christopher Paris, Oxebridge Quality Resources International, LLC and Christopher Mark Paris
Defendant:
Guberman PMC, LLC, Donald LaBelle and Daryl Guberman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
(PC) Rodriguez v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2019cv00739
Defendant:
Robert Clyborn, Mark Couvillion, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paris et al v. Levinson et al
as 8:2019cv00423
Defendant:
DARYL GUBERMAN, DONALD LABELLE, GUBERMAN PMC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Paris and OXEBRIDGE QUALITY RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 3:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
Nicole Palmer
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police , Frank Noonan , Tyree Blocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seal 2 v. USA
as 5:2015cv00132
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Pary, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Christopher Pary, Jr.
as 15-5421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER PARY, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
