Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Koch v. St. Clair County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2019cv01362
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Officer Knyff, Sergent Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roy Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03247
Plaintiff:
SHERRY JACKSON, TIMOTHY HECKERMAN, CHRISTOPHER HEINZE and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROJAS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03222
Plaintiff:
JOSE FILIBERTO ROJAS, DUSTIN JAY SANDERLIN, RYAN SCHUCK and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hays et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02215
Plaintiff:
Sherry Jackson, Timothy Heckerman, Christopher Heinze and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC, Aearo, LLC and others
Rojas et al v. Saulsberry et al
as 0:2019cv02208
Plaintiff:
Jose Filiberto Rojas, Dustin Jay Sanderlin, Ryan Schuck and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Bretas v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00184
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Christopher Roy Bretas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hoffman v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01538
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roy Hoffman
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, John Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffman v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00720
Defendant:
Jason Bell, John Doe 1-12, Judy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roy Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02870
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roy
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibbons v. Robert et al
as 8:2015cv02167
Plaintiff:
Peer Penon Gibbons
Defendant:
Christopher Roy Robert, Richard D. Zulker, Jason C. Platt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
