Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Majid v. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
as 8:2020cv02886
Plaintiff:
Tanveer S. Majid
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 jb
White v. CIA et al
as 1:2019cv02362
Defendant:
CIA, Chicago Police Department, Milwaukee Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Whitfield-Tibbs v. All Police Dept. et al
as 3:2019cv00283
Defendant:
All Cities I Have Been In, A Woman They Call Ruth or Mary Katherine or Catherine, All Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Virginia Whitfield-Tibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fakeye et al v. United States Government et al
as 8:2018cv00774
Plaintiff:
Dotun David Fakeye, Olushola Susan Fakeye, Oludolapo Mary Fakeye and others
Defendant:
United States Government, CIA, United States Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fakeye v. United States Government et al
as 8:2017cv02444
Plaintiff:
Dotun David Fakeye
Defendant:
United States Government, CIA and United States Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fakeye v. US Government et al
as 8:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Dotun David Fakeye
Defendant:
US Government, CIA, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aurora Julian Rockefeller v. James Carter
as 16-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AURORA JULIAN ROCKEFELLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES CARTER, former U.S. President, CIA AGENTS and U.S. CONSULS, at Manila U.S. Embassy during Carter Administration
Bach v. CIA
as 4:2015cv04915
Plaintiff:
David Charles Bach
Defendant:
CIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. NSA et al
as 6:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
Asha Lane Gibson
Defendant:
NSA, DEA, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
