Cases 1 - 10 of 345
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Blizzard et al
as 6:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R Cleveland
Defendant:
Attorney Jason T Blizzard, Circuit Judge Kathryn D. Weston and Asst State Attorney Amie M Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-2242
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Raiser v. Gelmis, et al.
as 24-2163
Plaintiff:
AARON RAISER
Defendant:
SUSAN GELMIS, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Roberson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
William G. Roberson, III
Defendant:
Cook County, State of Illinois, Chief Circuit Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Laura Baldwin v. Joshua Devine, et al
as 24-1510
Plaintiff:
Laura Marie Baldwin
Defendant:
Joshua C. Devine, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge, Callaway County 13th Circuit Court, Kevin M.J. Crane, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge and others
Putney v. Ross et al
as 1:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Stedrick Levelee Putney, Sr. and Stedrick Levelle Putney, Sr.
Defendant:
Circuit Judge Quincey Ross, Tad Huntsman, Prosecuting Attorney Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Wood et al
as 1:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
Dennis R Merritt
Defendant:
Andrea Wood, Diane P. Wood, Amy J. St. Eve and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
