Cases 11 - 20 of 239
Chapman v. Franklin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Commissioner John O'Grady, Kevin L Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. City of Columbus
as 2:2023cv03862
Plaintiff:
Leigh Anne Ward and Leigh A Ward
Defendant:
City of Columbus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jabr v. Ohio Department of Taxation et al
as 2:2023cv02651
Plaintiff:
Tareq R. Jabr
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Taxation, State of Ohio State Of Ohio, City of Columbus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Boyde v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2023cv02543
Plaintiff:
Duane Boyde
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Austin Endsley and Daniel Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burk et al v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2020cv06256
Defendant:
Joseph Fihe, Kevin Winchell and City of Columbus
Plaintiff:
Summer Hilfers and James A Burk, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
Nelson E Genshaft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Columbus v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45048
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smoot v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Keveante Deshawn Smoot
Defendant:
Dallas Baldwin and The City of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Wozniak et al
as 2:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Traci M. Shaw
Defendant:
Richard Wozniak and City of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
