Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, R. M. ASHLEY, RON SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. MACKEY et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
K. D. MACKEY, C.C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01064
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., C.C. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM TOMIN, JR., K.D. MORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 16-6377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Glenn Henderson v. Jim Ammon
as 15-1833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM AMMONS, in his official and personal capacity, MARY ANN TALLY, in her official and personal capacity, NATHAN HATCH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
