Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shrum v. Cooke, et al
as 21-3150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALT JASPER SAMUEL SHRUM
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSTIN COOKE, Investigator, Kingman County, Kansas Sheriff's Office in his official and individual capacities, TRAVIS SOWERS, Sergeant, City of Kingman, Kansas Police Department in his official and individual capacities, KINGMAN COUNTY, KANSAS and others
Robert Bennett, et al v. City of Kingman
as 21-16105
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF KINGMAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUDITH D. BENNETT and ROBERT E. BENNETT
Karen Weber v. Jace Reif, et al
as 21-15649
Defendant / Appellee:
JACE REIF, Officer and JANE DOE REIF, husband and wife
Defendant:
CITY OF KINGMAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREN WEBER, individually, as Personal Representative of the estate of Michael Weber
Ernest Bishop v. Jen Miles, et al
as 19-16247
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT DEVRIES, Chief, Police Department, ANNETTE SEYSSENS, Manager, North County Health Care, JEN MILES, Mayor, City of Kingman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST BISHOP
Jolly v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2019cv08088
Defendant:
Unknown Oehler, Unknown Gilbert, Mohave, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Jolly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Kingman v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op46057
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Kingman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-16944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Neal v. USDC-AZP
as 09-70479
:
In re: RICHARD LELAND NEAL
Petitioner:
RICHARD LELAND NEAL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF ARIZONA, body Politic, all in their official capacities, ROBERT DEVRIES, Kingman Chief of Police, ROCHELLE SILVA, Kingman police officer, all in their official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
