Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Amy Barnes v. Sampson County
as 26-1789
Plaintiff:
AMY BARNES
Defendant:
SAMPSON COUNTY, CITY OF CHARLOTTE, CITY OF WILSON and others
Bryan Turner v. Jordan King
as 26-6379
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANTHONY TURNER
Defendant:
JORDAN B. KING, Detective, Wilson Police Department and CITY OF WILSON
Wesley Bethea v. T. Bissette
as 26-1203
Plaintiff:
WESLEY LEON BETHEA
Defendant:
T. BISSETTE, CITY OF WILSON, BENNY BOYKIN and others
Bethea v. Bissette et al
as 5:2026ct03019
Plaintiff:
Wesley Leon Bethea
Defendant:
T. Bissette, City of Wilson, Benny Boykin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Sampson County et al
as 5:2025cv00616
Plaintiff:
Amy Barnes
Defendant:
Sampson County, City of Charlotte, City of Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bethea v. Bissette et al
as 5:2025cv00149
Plaintiff:
Wesley Leon Bethea
Defendant:
T. Bissette, City of Wilson, Benny Boykin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Breaux v. Worrell
as 24-30097
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Breaux, Jr., Linda Breaux, Jessie J. Blanchard and others
Defendant:
Kevin Ray Worrell, City of Wilson North Carolina, Travelers Indemnity Company, incorrectly names ad Travelers Indemnity Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Blanchard et al v. Travelers Indemnity Co et al
as 6:2022cv05254
Plaintiff:
Jessie J Blanchard and Vickie B Blanchard
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company, Kevin Ray Worrell, City of Wilson, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
