Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Arnoult et al v. CL Medical Sarl et al
as 1:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
Holly Arnoult and Chris Arnoult
Defendant:
CL Medical Sarl, CL Medical Inc. and Uroplasty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huntley v. CL Medical Sarl et al
as 2:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Huntley
Defendant:
CL Medical Sarl , CL Medical Inc. , Uroplasty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walton et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2014cv19866
Plaintiff:
Nina Walton and Levonia Walton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp., CL Medical, Inc. and CL Medical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Gaunce et al v. CL Medical Inc et al
as 8:2014cv00942
Defendant:
CL Medical Inc, Does and Uroplasty Inc
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gaunce and Mary Gaunce
Walton et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv12408
Plaintiff:
Nina Walton and Levonia Walton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp., CL Medical, Inc. and CL Medical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roland v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv14690
Plaintiff:
Artie E. Roland
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Coloplast Corp. and CL Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roland v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as MA/1:14-cv-11252
Plaintiff:
Artie Roland
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Coloplast Corporation and CL Medical Inc.
Roland v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv11252
Plaintiff:
Artie Roland
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Coloplast Corporation and CL Medical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03407
Plaintiff:
Dawn Nichols and Shawn Nichols
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, CL Medical Inc and Urpolasty Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as ILC/3:13-cv-03407
Plaintiff:
Dawn Nichols and Shawn Nichols
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , CL Medical Inc and Urpolasty Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
