Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Clay v. Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
DaRon Clay
Defendant:
Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busey v. Stanton
as 2:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Marcus Busey
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDannell v. City of Gladstone et al
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher M McDannell
Defendant:
City of Gladstone, Jean Moore, Gladstone Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Stanton et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Marion M. Chapman
Defendant:
Clay Stanton, G. Fife, Brittany Tischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilt v. Clay County Public Defender's Office et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Clay County Public Defender's Office, Andrew James Ruhlman, Kevin Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilt v. Clay County Sheriff Dept et al
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff Dept, Phillips, Teale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Stanton
as 4:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Marion M Chapman
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Stanton et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Marion Marcellus Chapman
Defendant:
Clay Stanton, Jalilah Otto and Theresa Crayon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. City of Excelsior Springs, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Dianna Chase
Defendant:
City of Excelsior Springs, Missouri, Gregory Dull, Bret Rider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Stanton
as 2:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Marion M. Chapman
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
