Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 110
TAPP-EL v. CLAY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00911
Petitioner: Michael Tapp-El
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY and HARVEY CLAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tapp-El v. Clay et al
as 5:2018hc02262
Petitioner: Michael Tapp-El
Respondent: State of North Carolina and Harvey Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Means v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2018hc02255
Respondent: State of Alabama and Luther Strange
Petitioner: Willie Clay Means
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meyers et al v. Catamount Marketing Group, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00551
Defendant: Christopher Landis, Karen Landis, Concelium, LLC, d/b/a Liberty Tax and others
Plaintiff: Ernestine Washington, Patricia Roberts and Dammione Meyers
Bailey v. Clay
as 5:2018hc02240
Petitioner: Derrick T. Bailey
Respondent: Harvey Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00530
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
SELECT THIN BRICK, LLC v. GLOBAL PRECAST, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00749
Defendant: GLOBAL PRECAST, INC. and TAYLOR CLAY PRODUCTS, INC.
Plaintiff: SELECT THIN BRICK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SELECT THIN BRICK, LLC v. GLOBAL PRECAST, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant: GLOBAL PRECAST, INC. and TAYLOR CLAY PRODUCTS, INC.
Plaintiff: SELECT THIN BRICK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Hernandez v. Clay
as 3:2018cv00333
Plaintiff: Norberto Manuel Hernandez
Defendant: William S. Clay, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ballard v. Hooks et al
as 5:2018ct03003
Plaintiff: Timothy Franklin Ballard, III
Defendant: Erik A. Hooks, Harvey Clay, James McRae and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?