Cases 71 - 80 of 268
v. Shanklin et al
as 2:2020cv00984
Defendant:
Dolly Marie Days, George A. Shanklin, Pinnacle Global Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Kendell v. Shanklin et al
as 2:2020cv00985
Defendant:
George Arthur Shanklin, Dolly Marie Days, Pinnacle Global Investments LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kellee Kendell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
v. Shanklin et al
as 2:2020oe00984
Defendant:
Dolly Marie Days, George A. Shanklin, Pinnacle Global Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Bottum v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2020cv00288
Defendant:
Nurse Michael Shaw, Frederick Barthany, Matt Schwartz and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Bottum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
County of Alameda et al v. Richard S. Sackler et al
as 1:2020op45055
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oxnard, County of Alameda, City of Costa Mesa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Coward et al v. Richard Snyder et al
as 5:2020cv10307
Plaintiff:
E. B., Monica Embeck, Romell Barkus and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Prysby, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Connor v. Chatfield et al
as 2:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Megan K. Cavanagh, Lucas Middleton, Brian K. Zahra and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frank MassengillIn re: Frank Massengill
as 19-6123
Petitioner:
In re: FRANK CLEMENT MASSENGILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sears v. Sears et al
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant:
Carma Dennis McGee, Dr. Robert M. Wheatley, Elaine B. Beeler and others
Plaintiff:
Anne A. Sears
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Clement v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03837
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jodene Clement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
