Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Sparks v. Cross County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ellis Sparks
Defendant:
Cross County Jail, Arleen Clements and Does Cam, C. O., Cross County Jail; and Matt, C. O. Cross County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buomkuoth Well v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 23-2212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Buomkuoth Gatluak Puot Well
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, Fifth Judicial District, Christopher Rovney and others
Henyard v. Clements et al
as 3:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Paul Henyard, Jr
Defendant:
Tom Clemons, Doe and Tom Clements
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clement v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Ty Clement
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Well v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Buomkuoth Gatluak Puot Well
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Fifth Judicial District, Christopher Rowney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Garland et al
as 0:2021cv01191
Defendant:
Lt. Gilbertson, Chad Orum, S. Kallis and others
Plaintiff:
Clement David King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Kallis et al
as 0:2021cv01149
Petitioner:
Clement David King
Respondent:
Unnamed Bureau of Prisons Regional Director and Warden Kallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riley v. Hagler et al
as 3:2020cv00400
Defendant:
Arlene Clements, Caleb Humphrey, Luther Hagler and others
Plaintiff:
DeVante Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCuiston v. Hagler et al
as 3:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Caleb Humphrey, Arlene Clements, Luther Hagler and others
Plaintiff:
Donovan McCuiston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clement v. USA
as 0:2019cv01031
Petitioner:
Inemo Seimokuma Clement
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
