Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Citi Trends, Inc. et al v. Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01763
Plaintiff:
Citi Trends, Inc. and Kelly Martin
Defendant:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Coach, Inc., et al v. Lloyd
as 7:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Jacqueline Dowless Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Coach Inc et al v. Liron Inc et al
as 4:2014cv03233
Plaintiff:
Coach Inc and Coach Services Inc
Defendant:
Liron Inc, David Arrar and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Coach, Inc. et al v. Gologo et al
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Demba Samba Gologo and Gologo Store
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Coach, Inc. et al v. Donovan et al
as 1:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Nina Yuri Donovan, Scott H. Donovan and Scott H. Donovan, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Coach, Inc., et al v. Brands for Less, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Brands for Less, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Coach, Inc., et al v. Sun Super Market, Inc., et al
as 5:2013cv00679
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Sun Super Market, Inc. and Mi Kyong Rojas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Coach, Inc. et al v. Nguyen
as 5:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc. and Coach, Inc.
Defendant:
Huong Ngoc Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Coach, Inc. et al v. Does 1 through 351
as 1:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1 through 351
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Coach, Inc. et al v. Paradise Cove Sun Studio et al
as 6:2011cv00551
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Paradise Cove Sun Studio, Robert B. Bargeloh, Jody L. Bargeloh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
