Cases 1 - 10 of 673
Globokar v. Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01723
Plaintiff:
William Globokar
Defendant:
Hess Corporation, James H. Quigley, Terrence J. Checki and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
61 East Main Street Associates, LLC et al v. The Village of Washingtonville et al
as 7:2024cv02647
Plaintiff:
61 East Main Street Associates, LLC and Moche Halpern
Defendant:
the Village of Washingtonville, New York, Thomas DeVinko, Donna Jacaruso and others
Coleman v. Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Towaun Coleman
Defendant:
Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility and J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moffatt v. Adams et al
as 2:2024cv02348
Plaintiff:
Helene Moffatt
Defendant:
Eric Mayor Adams, City of New York, Karen Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coleman v. Vining et al
as 6:2024cv06188
Plaintiff:
Laurene Marie Coleman
Defendant:
William Vining, State of New York and Kathy Koscioleck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Wolcott et al
as 6:2024cv06182
Plaintiff:
Windsor Coleman
Defendant:
Wolcott, Tomprowski and John Doe/Mr. H
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
