Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Terrence Gay v. Administrative Office of The Courts, et al
as 22-14264
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE HERSCHEL GAY
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, JOHN DOE and COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT
BROWN v. COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT et al
as 4:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN
Defendant:
COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, ROBERT HOOKS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GAY v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS et al
as 4:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE HERSCHEL GAY
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, JOHN DOE and COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER-GOGGINS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE WALKER-GOGGINS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF COLUMBUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Betties et al
as 3:2021mc03938
Defendant:
Vandon Lamar Betties
Garnishee:
Columbus Consolidated Government
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
