Cases 31 - 40 of 437
Communications Workers of America, Local 9423 v. Alvarado
as 5:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
Communications Workers of America, Local 9423
Defendant:
Monica Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Indiana Bell Telephone Compan v. NLRB, et al
as 21-1569
Petitioner:
INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA AND ITS LOCAL UNION NO. 4900
Ohio Bell Telephone Company v. Local 4340 Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
as 1:2021cv00635
Defendant:
Local 4340 Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO and Local 4340, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
Plaintiff:
Ohio Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Denver Newspaper Guild, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4100
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
DENVER NEWSPAPER GUILD, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 37074, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES N. JEFFRESS, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and others
Ohio Bell Telephone Company v. Local 4340
as 21-4203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 4340
Jared Goyette, et al v. John Harrington, et al
as 22-1017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jared Goyette, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, Craig Lassig, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, Communications Workers of America, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Shum
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, Medaria Arradondo, Minneapolis Chief of Police, in his individual and official capacity, Robert Kroll, Minneapolis Police Lieutenant, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
John Harrington, Minnesota Department of Public Safety Commissioner, in his individual and official capacity, Matthew Langer, Minnesota State Patrol Colonel, in his individual and official capacity and Joseph Dwyer, Minnesota State Patrol Major, in his individual capacity
IUE-CWA, The Industrial Division of the Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC v. GE Appliances
as 3:2021cv00626
Plaintiff:
Local Union No.83761 IUE-CWA, The Industrial Division of the Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC and IUE-CWA, The Industrial Division of the Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC, Local Union No.83761
Defendant:
GE Appliances
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185
Natl Assn of Broadcast Empl, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4087
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCAST EMPLOYEES & TECHNICIANS, THE BROADCASTING AND CABLE TELEVISION WORKERS SECTOR OF THE COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 51, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Media Guild of the West v. OSHA
as 21-4103
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
MEDIA GUILD OF THE WEST, THE NEWS GUILD-COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 39213
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
The Denver Newspaper Guild, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-9592
Petitioner:
THE DENVER NEWSPAPER GUILD, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 37074 and AFL-CIO
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
