Cases 1 - 6 of 6
US v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 20-2115
Interested Party:
BEATRIZ VILA-CABASSA, ALBERTO ORTIZ-RIVERA, on behalf of brother's home, CARMELO RODRIGUEZ, Second Assistant to the JCC- Dr. Sylvia Fernndez and others
Defendant:
LORENZO GONZALEZ-FELICIANO, Secretary, Department of Health, JOSE DE-LEON, Director, Mental Retardation Program and WANDA VAZQUEZ-GARCED, Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 20-1805
Interested Party:
BEATRIZ VILA-CABASSA, DIANA M. ALCARAZ IRIZARRY, DRA. DIMARIS GARCIA and others
Defendant:
LORENZO GONZALEZ-FELICIANO, Secretary, Department of Health, JOSE DE-LEON, Director, Mental Retardation Program and WANDA VAZQUEZ-GARCED, Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 20-1556
Interested Party:
BEATRIZ VILA-CABASSA, DIANA M. ALCARAZ IRIZARRY, DRA. DIMARIS GARCIA and others
Defendant:
LORENZO GONZALEZ-FELICIANO, Secretary, Department of Health, JOSE DE-LEON, Director, Mental Retardation Program and WANDA VAZQUEZ-GARCED, Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
CONCEPCION TORRES GOMEZ v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2016cv04913
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP America, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Top Rank Inc. v. Torres
as 2:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Top Rank Inc. and Top Rank Inc.
Defendant:
Concepcion Torres
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
