Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Halliburton et al v. Eades et al
as 5:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Halliburton and Leah Mari Halliburton
Defendant:
Bryan M Eades, Conner P Newman and Connor P Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Hudgins et al
as 4:2020cv00497
Defendant:
Chad Hudgins, Angela McNeill, Victoria Rylant and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Holland v. Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00663
Defendant:
Cody Smith, Dick White, Flint Junod and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2019cv00047
Defendant:
The City of Kingston Oklahoma, Marshall County Sheriff's Department Oklahoma, Oklahoma State of and others
Plaintiff:
Charles M Conner, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conner v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2018cv01218
Defendant:
The City of Kingston Oklahoma, The County of Marshall Oklahoma and State of Oklahoma
Plaintiff:
Charles M Conner, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00500
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Mohn v. Jewell, et al.,
as 6:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Abiodun Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
