Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gabriel Gonzalez v. Kendes Archer, et al
as 20-13280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL GONZALEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
PELT, Assistant Health Services Administrator, KENDES ARCHER, M.D., RYLES, Health Services Administrator and others
GOTHARD v. BUTTS
as 5:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
WALTER KEITH GOTHARD
Defendant:
JOHNNY BUTTS, MCCOLLOUGH, RUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Rager v. Paige Augustine, et al
as 18-10834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD W. RAGER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAIGE AUGUSTINE, KEITH BUFORD, S MALONE and others
Parsons v. Texas Office of the Attorney General et al
as 4:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
Gregory K Parsons
Defendant:
Texas Office of the Attorney General and Connie Copeland
Respondent:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gabriel Gonzalez v. Kendez Archer, et al
as 17-11290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
KENDEZ ARCHER, MD, CONNIE COPELAND, RYLES, Health Services Administrator and others
Donald Rager v. FCI Marianna Warden, et al
as 17-11026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD W. RAGER
Defendant - Appellee:
FCI MARIANNA WARDEN, KEITH BUFORD, Lieutenant FCI Marianna, S MALONE, Lieutenant FCI Marianna and others
GONZALEZ v. ARCHER et al
as 5:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL GONZALEZ
Defendant:
KENDES ARCHER, CONNIE COPELAND, RYLES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PETERS v. SHOUPPE, et al
as 5:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
TRACY ALLEN PETERS
Defendant:
GREG SHOUPPE, GINA JONES and CONNIE COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAGER v. AUGUSTINE
as 5:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
DONALD W RAGER
Defendant:
PAIGE AUGUSTINE, KEITH BUFORD, S MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITNEY v. WALKER
as 2:2014cv00278
Defendant:
BIGLEY, CONNIE COPELAND, GARDENER and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WHITNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
