Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hutchinson Sealing Systems, Inc. v. Cooper-Standard Automotive, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01745
Plaintiff:
Hutchinson Sealing Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Cooper-Standard Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CKCS, Inc. v. Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc.
as 5:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
CKCS, Inc.
Defendant:
Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LWD PRP Group v. Alcan Corp, et al
as 14-5730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LWD PRP GROUP
Defendant - Appellant:
DUKE ENERGY OHIO INC., improperly captioned as Duke Energy Corporation, ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION and others
In re: Alcan Corporation, et al
as 14-503
Petitioner:
In re: ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION, BAKER HUGHES INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Nartron Corporation v. Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc.
as 4:2010cv12293
Defendant:
Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nartron Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
