Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04542
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TAYLOR v. MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY (USA), INC. et al
as 2:2026cv08193
Plaintiff:
COREY TAYLOR
Defendant:
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY (USA), INC. and JOHN DOE(S) 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Taylor v. Baugus et al
as 1:2026cv00109
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Sgt. f/n/u Baugus, Sgt. Brandon Peone, Sgt. Dustin Mackin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. James et al
as 1:2026cv00060
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Taurean James, Frank Strada, Linda R. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. James et al
as 3:2025cv01419
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Taurean James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. James et al
as 1:2025cv00099
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Taurean James, Lloyd Hancock, Kevin Rhea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. James et al
as 1:2025cv00079
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Taurean James, State of TN, Andre Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Global Tel Link Corporation via Path Technologies
as 1:2025cv00048
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation via Path Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Taylor v. Wellpath, LLC, et al
as 25-5449
Plaintiff:
COREY TAYLOR
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, DOCTOR HOANG BRIAN NGUYEN and METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN
TAYLOR v. HOWARD et al
as 2:2025cv00458
Plaintiff:
COREY TAYLOR
Defendant:
MIKE HOWARD, CAPTAIN JOSEPH RUSNAK and RHONDAY HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
