Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Moore v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv03095
Plaintiff:
Othel Moore
Defendant:
Wixom, Douglas Arthur, Shawn Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller-Bey v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Van Loo, Brock Van Loo, MD John Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Hilary B Miller-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller-Bey v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv04027
Defendant:
Van Loo, Brock Van Loo, Jane Wheeler and others
Plaintiff:
Hilary B Miller-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv03068
Plaintiff:
Ernest C Williams
Defendant:
Ian Wallace, Darrell D Case, Richard Fritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv06122
Defendant:
Ronda J. Pash, Corizon Medical Services, Inc. and Mr. Whitmore
Plaintiff:
William Wintworth Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheat v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00071
Defendant:
Unknown Hanson, Wanda Patton, Tammy Harr and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Wheat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffmann v. Precythe et al
as 4:2018cv00790
Plaintiff:
Brian Hoffmann
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Dean Minor, Bonnie Boley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kempker et al
as 1:2015cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ira B. Harris
Defendant:
Gary Kempker, Ian Wallace, Corizon Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. Campbell et al
as 2:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Cooley
Defendant:
Gary Campbell, Elizabeth Conley, Michael Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahone v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv00224
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Mahone
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Corizon Medical Services, Inc., Unknown Stamps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
