Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Corliveetho McMillian v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 19-2000
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORLIVEETHO MCMILLIAN
MCMILLIAN v. HARRY et al
as 2:2017cv03796
Petitioner:
CORLIVEETHO MCMILLIAN
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Corliveetho McMillian v. John Wetzel, et al
as 17-2055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORLIVEETHO MCMILLIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, JEFFREY WITHERITE, Western Region Staff Assistant of Department of Corrections, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
MCMILLIAN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01529
Plaintiff:
CORLIVEETHO MCMILLIAN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY WITHERITE, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Hollinger
as 1:2014cv01000
Plaintiff:
Corliveetho McMillian
Defendant:
Gary Hollinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMILLIAN v. WALSH
as 2:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
CORLIVEETHO MCMILLIAN
Defendant:
JEROME WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
McMillian v. Walsh
as 1:2013cv03085
Plaintiff:
Corliveetho McMillian
Defendant:
Jerome Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MCMILLIAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
CORLIVEETHO MCMILLIAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON, DRISSEL and VANCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Walsh et al
as 1:2012cv01707
Plaintiff:
Corliveetho McMillian
Defendant:
Jerome Walsh, Norman Demming, Kathy Brittin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillian v. Walsh et al
as 1:2011cv02223
Plaintiff:
Corliveetho McMillian
Defendant:
Jerome Walsh, Bleich, D. Buck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
