Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Donald Weaver, Jr. v. Correctional Medical Services,, et al
as 21-1641
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVEEN RAJOLI, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD E. WEAVER, JR.
George Jackson v. Keith Ivens, et al
as 19-3539
Defendant / Appellee:
M.D. KEITH IVENS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE A. JACKSON
Yancey v. The County of Albany
as 19-320
Defendant:
County of Albany, Daniel F. Lynch, County Attorney, Corizon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael C. Yancey
Defendant / Appellee:
Douglas Robertson, Corrections Officer, Albany County Correctional Facility, FKA John Doe
In re: Mark Reed-Bey, et al
as 11-101
Petitioner:
MARK ANTHONY REED-BEY
Respondent:
GEORGE PRAMSTALLER, RICHARD D. RUSSELL and CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
Parsons v. Heebsh et al
as 2:2009cv14411
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Parsons and Jeannie Parsons
Defendant:
Hope S Heebsh, Hope S Heebsh, Correctional Medical Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Quigley v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv14221
Plaintiff:
Allen Quigley
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Tuong Vinh Thai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Butler, et al v. Shelby County, et al
as 2:2003cv02650
Plaintiff:
Lynell Marcus Butler , Kevin Andersen , Myron Arps and others
Defendant:
Shelby County Government , Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and Annie's Pest Control Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
as 2:2009cv04096
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Smith
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
