Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Hall v. Burkhalter et al
as 4:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
Hudon Lipton Hall
Defendant:
Tim Burkhalter, Bob Couey and Leigh Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUEY v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66410
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DONALD COUEY
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rod Couey v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2010cv00883
Plaintiff:
Rod Couey
Defendant:
County of Orange and DOES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Serpentfoot v. Rome City Commission et al
as 4:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
Serpentfoot
Defendant:
Rome City Commission, Rome City Commission, Wright Bagby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
AARON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv75532
Plaintiff:
EDWARD COUEY and OFFIE COUEY
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
AARON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv75533
Plaintiff:
PALMER COUEY
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Kevin Spears v. Mr. Cox et al
as 2:2009cv04996
Plaintiff:
Kevin Spears
Defendant:
Cox, F. B. Haws and B. Couey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
COUEY et al v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv74133
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. COUEY and LAVERNE COUEY
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION and PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Couey v. Hurst et al
as 1:2008cv02519
Plaintiff:
Shauna Couey
Defendant:
Randy (I) Hurst, Randy Hurst, Gerald (I) R. Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
