Cases 21 - 30 of 85
RANDLE et al v. PENNSAUKEN et al
as 1:2021cv01073
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, PENNSAUKEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN and others
Plaintiff:
Randle Tanisha, Estate of Michael Thomas Jr., TANISHA RANDLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Keidron Alexander v. Borough of Pine Hill, et al
as 20-3435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEIDRON ALEXANDER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY COLALILLO, Camden County Prosecutor, BOROUGH OF PINE HILL, BOROUGH OF PINE HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
SMITH v. PALERMO et al
as 1:2020cv14405
Defendant:
COLIN LEX, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, WILLIAM JOAS and others
Plaintiff:
RAHSAAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv13892
Defendant:
EDWARD T. MCDONNELL, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMBY v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv13893
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN and CITY OF CAMDEN
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYMS v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv02073
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN SYMS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, GEORGE LEWIS, III and JOHN DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wich v. County of Camden
as 2:2019cv04026
Defendant:
County of Camden
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOPPS v. CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv01411
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOPPS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT , GEORGE LEWIS, III , ADAM TUVEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINONES v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv13769
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. QUINONES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS, CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTE v. BOROUGH OF LAWNSIDE et al.
as 1:2017cv11986
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LAWNSIDE , BOROUGH OF LAWNSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT , COUNTY OF CAMDEN and others
Plaintiff:
DEVON MONTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
