Cases 31 - 40 of 200
County of Sonoma v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:21-CV-00615
Plaintiff:
County of Sonoma
Defendant:
3M Company, The
County of Sonoma v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv00615
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation, 3M Company, The, AGC Inc and others
Plaintiff:
County of Sonoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonilla v. Superior Court, County of Sonoma
as 4:2021cv01245
Defendant:
Superior Court, County of Sonoma
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stamey v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 3:2021cv00892
Defendant:
Does 1-50, County of Sonoma and City of Santa Rosa
Plaintiff:
Ryland Stamey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Cupp v. Andrew Smith, et al
as 20-16973
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SONOMA, MARK FRANCESCHI, TYRA HARRINGTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD CUPP
Robert Dixon v. County of Sonoma, et al
as 20-16620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT GIORDANO and COUNTY OF SONOMA
Estate of Nino Bosco, by and through sucessor in interest, Frauka Kozar et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2020cv04859
Defendant:
Mark Essick, County of Sonoma, Mazen Awad and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Nino Bosco, by and through sucessor in interest, Frauka Kozar and Frauka Kozar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McDonald v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2020cv04183
Defendant:
Mark Essick, Brent Kidder, Town of Windsor and others
Plaintiff:
La'Marcus McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Bush v. State of California, et al
as 20-16200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM DAVID BUSH
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNDRAI R. MASE, County of Sonoma Health Officer and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cupp v. Smith et al
as 4:2020cv03456
Defendant:
Tennis Wick, Andrew Smith, County of Sonoma and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cupp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
