Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Cox v. Commissioner Of Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Samuel I. Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Department of Human Services, Sara Kulas, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shipman v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Dominique Shipman
Defendant:
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. doing business as Ulta Beauty, Ulta Beauty, Inc. doing business as Ulta Beauty, City of Roseville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cox et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03438
Plaintiff:
Donald Cox and Jamie Cox
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cox v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02606
Plaintiff:
William Cox
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cox v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02594
Plaintiff:
Virginia Cox
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Bray et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bray, Robert Davies, Steven Alon Flowers Hart and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Sheadrick et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Sheadrick, Alfred Twyman, Michael O'bannon and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Jefferson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Troy Jefferson, Jennifer Light, Robert Summers and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rustan et al v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2022cv02190
Plaintiff:
Judy Rustan, Ryan Rustan, Keli Cox and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Centurion of Minnesota, LLC, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
