Cases 1 - 10 of 142
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARNER v. JAMERSON et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
KRYSTEN GARNER
Defendant:
ANTONIA JAMERSON, WARREN BALTES, JUSTIN MOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. DUPREE et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Defendant:
Steven Dupree, Eugene Sapp, Warden Hilton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
DARRELL D CROSS
Defendant:
CHIEF UNIT MANGER STEVEN DUPREE, UNIT MANAGER EUGENE SAPP, WARDEN HILTON HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00042
Respondent:
SCOTT CRICKMAR, RAYMOND MOODY, AL JONES and others
Petitioner:
RANDY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDWARDS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00032
Respondent:
SCOTT CRICKMAR, Deputy Warden SHROPSHIRE, Deputy Warden MIMS and others
Petitioner:
RANDY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. WARD et al
as 7:2021cv00033
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, SCOTT CRICKMAR, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
SHEM O MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Ms. [FNU] Mosely, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Mr. [FNU] Whitfield and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
