Cases 1 - 10 of 991
Marlen-Pantaleon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2996
Petitioner:
DIANA MARLEN-PANTALEON and CRISTIAN MAJERA-PANTALEON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chicaiza-Caisaguano v. Garland
as 24-1275
Petitioner:
MYRIAN YOLANDA CHICAIZA-CAISAGUANO, DYLAN DARIO GUACHICHULLCA-CHICAIZA and CRISTIAN DANIEL GUACHICHULLCA-CHICAIZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guinac-Tzul v. Garland
as 24-2963
Petitioner:
SELVIN CRISTIAN GUINAC-TZUL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sosa et al v. 28Freight LLC d/b/a Truck Courier
as 4:2024cv40064
Plaintiff:
Claudio Sosa, Luis Aguilar and Cristian Lamarque
Defendant:
28Freight LLC d/b/a Truck Courier and Richard Marks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanchez-Portillo v. Garland
as 24-1117
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN SANCHEZ-PORTILLO, KAREN YANES-SANTOS, ZOE MATUTE-YANES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Enamorado-Andrade v. Garland
as 24-2486
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN LORENZO ENAMORADO-ANDRADE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cristian Torres v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1558
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN NOEL TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Vargas-Nino, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2160
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN CAMILO VARGAS-NINO, LINA YISSEL BARON-SAAVEDRA, NIKOLAS VARGAS-BARON and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Valdez v. Cardinal Construction LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Cristian Valdez
Defendant:
Cardinal Construction LLC, Dalten Gabbard and Unknown Gabbard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
