Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Crowley v. Lemons et al
as 4:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Lemons, Lee, Arce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Jordan et al
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Jordan, Ataway, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey et al v. Crowley et al
as 4:2021cv01094
Plaintiff:
Iyanga Bey
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Demar Bey and Sha'rajah Bey
3Rd Party Defendant:
Sean T Crowley, John Dunn, Giovanni Orlando and others
Defendant:
Sean T Crowley d/b/a Massachusetts State Trooper Badge #4276, John Dunn d/b/a Massachusetts State Trooper Badge #4119, Giovanni Orlando d/b/a Massachusetts State Trooper Badge #4581 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Crowley v. Nailor et al
as 5:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Stark, Pierre, Nailor and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowley v. Musclewhite et al
as 5:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Musclewhite, Budnik, Vernon Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Does
as 4:2017cv00531
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Advanced Medical Reviews Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
Garry Stewart
Defendant:
Advanced Medical Reviews Inc, Examworks Inc, J D Haines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assualt,Slander
Rodriguez v. Helder et al
as 5:2017cv05034
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Rodriguez
Defendant:
Helder , Denzer , Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Butler et al
as 2:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wayne Cole
Defendant:
Quible Butler , Crowley, Mansfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowley v. Lunsford et al
as 4:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Patrick Lunsford , Bruce Pennington , Tonia Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
