Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Curtis Jones v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 22-2854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
JONES v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JONES
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS and HERBERT SYMCEZK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. FUSCO et al
as 2:2021cv14220
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JONES
Defendant:
LT. FUSCO and JOHN DOE 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv02945
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Petitioner:
CURTIS JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
JONES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2016cv04870
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JONES and SHARRON L. JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENSLEY et al v. FIRST STUDENT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 1:2015cv05865
Plaintiff:
KATHY HENSLEY , JEAN DESANE , SUSAN LAMBERTI and others
Defendant:
FIRST STUDENT MANAGEMENT LLC and FIRST STUDENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HENSLEY et al v. FIRST STUDENT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03811
Plaintiff:
KATHY HENSLEY , JEAN DESANE , SUSAN LAMBERTI and others
Defendant:
FIRST STUDENT MANAGEMENT LLC and FIRST STUDENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MERRETAZON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2014cv04941
Plaintiff:
ARI SESU MERRETAZON
Defendant:
DARRELL CLARK , DAVID OH , CURTIS JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv04298
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY JONES
Defendant:
NUTTER, DARRELL L. CLARKE, MARK SQUILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
